Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz doesn't want to run for the White House. But, buoyed by his company's surging performance, the billionaire wants to use his caffeinated perch to change American discourse
What does Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz keep in his pockets? Two keys stand out. One unlocks the most lavish Starbucks store in the world: The 15,000-square-feet Roastery. Situated in Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighbourhood, it combines an upscale cafe with whirring conveyor belts that ferry packages of freshly roasted coffee before admiring customers. Let Nike have Niketown; Schultz has created a Willy Wonka-style celebration of coffee.
The other key reveals something deeper. It opens the shabby little store on the Seattle waterfront where Starbucks got its start. It’s always 1971 there, with the same rough-hewn bins and counters that defined the brand in the days of the Vietnam War. Nobody has ever modernised the place. “I go there at 4:15 am sometimes, just by myself,” the 62-year-old Schultz tells me. “It’s the right place whenever I need centring.”
Centring? The last we checked, the willingness of billionaire CEOs to recentre themselves was hovering around zero. But that’s Schultz: Always the underdog, always blending the personal with the profitable. Since taking charge of Starbucks in the 1980s, he has turned a regional coffee company into one of the world’s top brands. Sales topped $19 billion in 2015, thanks to Starbucks’ ability to provide food and coffee along with a feel-good environment where friends meet, students do their homework and romances come of age. By delivering what he calls “performance through the lens of humanity,” Schultz has amassed a fortune of nearly $3 billion. Yet in any sustained conversation, he keeps going back to when he was a nobody.
“I’m still this kid from Brooklyn who wanted to fight his way out,” Schultz says. He grew up in the 1960s in subsidised housing, steeped in the anxieties of a father who suffered workplace injuries and couldn’t hold a job. “I didn’t go to an Ivy League school,” Schultz reminds me. “I didn’t go to business school.” Instead of resenting those early deprivations, he treasures them. Schultz has discovered that America—and, in fact, the whole world—loves an up-from-hardship story. His candour about his beginnings in the gritty Canarsie section helps him strike a rapport with everyone from other chief executives to young black and Latino adults trying to find their first jobs. “Even though I don’t have the same colour of skin,” Schultz explains, “I was one of those kids. I could have today been one of those kids.”
It’s a classic American story, one that forced Schultz to bat down rumours last year that he was going to run for President.
On paper, this self-made tycoon compares favourably to a certain bombastic billionaire springboarded with Daddy’s money. But Schultz wasn’t at all interested in the campaign, in part because, while the 2016 presidential contenders debase themselves during this circus-like primary, Schultz already has a caffeinated bully pulpit from which to steer discourse—and Starbucks’ stunning financial performance affords him pretty much unbridled authority to use it.
More than anything, Schultz wants to become America’s conciliator-in-chief. He’s troubled by the angry tone in politics and everyday discourse, which makes him think that, as a country, we’ve “lost our conscience”.
Searching for inspiration, he’s travelled everywhere from veterans’ hospitals to an Indian ashram in the past year, asking people to share their stories and their beliefs.
Now he wants Starbucks to be the place where people can get excited about voting again, where people can courteously discuss tough issues such as gun rights and race relations—and where “we can elevate citizenship and humanity”.
It all sounds lovely, but last March Schultz’s crusade blew up in his face. Everything started smoothly when the Starbucks boss began asking employees in late 2014 about America’s race relations. He was jolted by the upheaval in Ferguson, Missouri, after a white policeman was exonerated in the fatal shooting of an unarmed black teen. His employees were, too. Their private conversations were raw, heartfelt and cathartic. Baristas and store managers burst into tears, talking about ugly moments they had seen. People hugged. Everyone wished that America could overcome its past. Schultz was so moved that he decided to relaunch these conversations in 7,000 Starbucks stores. Baristas were encouraged to write ‘Race Together’ on millions of patrons’ coffee cups. Then, somehow, good things would result.
What unfolded was a national embarrassment. Hectic morning-coffee lines, full of strangers, proved far chillier than a staff meeting with time for hugs. Baristas felt hurled into an edgy new role without any training. Patrons found the gesture bewildering. After this awkward start many baristas put their pens in hiding. Starbucks ended the initiative after a week. (The company says that was always the plan.)
Undeterred, the Seattle coffee king’s ambitions remain as big as ever, with Schultz targeting death-penalty injustices, chronic unemployment, veterans’ needs and the college aspirations of his baristas. Watching Schultz’s crusades in the wake of the race debacle is akin to seeing a sword-swallower at a carnival. Each project generates its own rush of excitement. Each is tinged by a thrilling, terrifying sense that it could all go horribly wrong in an instant.
A few weeks ago Schultz and I ended up at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, in an empty theatre, sipping Starbucks’ Aged Sumatra from paper cups. Schultz was collecting his thoughts, minutes before going onstage to fire up 300 of his employees about his favourite topic: What’s wrong in society and how his company could be a force for good. “We’ve got this big idea,” he told me, in a voice that mixed eagerness and hesitation. “It’s like a piece of clay, but it’s not yet shaped. I’m going to ask people for their help.”
Bounding onto the Brooklyn stage, Schultz began by ticking off issues that concerned him: Death benefits for soldiers killed in Iraq or Afghanistan, gun safety and the 2016 presidential election. “We’re not just here to raise the stock price,” he declared. “What can we do to use our strength for social good?”
Over the next 90 minutes 34 store managers and baristas took the microphone to share their ideas and concerns. As with most voters, they were less interested in policy theories—save a few that talked about their own volunteer work in local schools—and much more into the gritty realities of their daily lives. We get a lot of homeless people in our stores… Can we get more security?… Can we get more training for the baristas?… Could there be a child-care option?
If Schultz was disappointed, he didn’t let on. “That’s a great idea,” he told several questioners. “We’re working on it,” he reassured others. When one part-time employee wanted to know why he wasn’t getting much paid vacation time, Schultz started to lob the question toward a human-relations specialist in the audience—and then caught himself in midsentence. “You know what?” Schultz declared. “You’ve been here 16 years. You deserve a vacation. We’re going to get you one.” The room burst into applause. Schultz came over to give the barista a hug, and someone snapped a picture.
Watching Schultz work a crowd, you can see why he would have made a natural candidate. But the political bug has faded. A lifelong Democrat, Schultz says he no longer thinks the government holds the answers to issues that concern him most. He has little interest in visiting Washington, and hasn’t made a presidential political contribution since supporting Barack Obama in 2008. Board member Mellody Hobson is even clearer: “Howard knows himself well enough to realise that a role in national politics isn’t right for him.”
Yet Schultz can’t surrender his dream of fixing America. At the very least, he can make Starbucks itself a laboratory for developing a better society. In the past year, Starbucks has set up 19 cafes on the edge of military bases, going out of its way to hire veterans and active-duty spouses to work there. Another initiative is a partnership with other big companies to convene giant job fairs in cities such as Phoenix, Chicago and Los Angeles, inviting out-of-work young adults for job interviews. A third programme, started in 2014, provides baristas and other employees a chance to earn an online college degree from Arizona State University—with Starbucks absorbing all tuition costs.
At most companies, any CEO so immersed in social causes would risk a shareholder mutiny. Schultz can’t ignore his investors; he owns just under 3 percent of the company. But Starbucks is a special case, says Chief Financial Officer Scott Maw, who joined the coffee company in 2011 after many years in the hard-nosed cultures of General Electric and JPMorgan Chase. When you’re selling lattes instead of locomotives or loans, Maw observes, a $3.45 grande isn’t just a beverage; it’s a ticket into “a pleasant experience and an ethically sound way of doing things”. Schultz’s crusades have become part of the product, morphing Starbucks into one of the biggest social businesses on the planet.
“Howard Schultz has always wanted to do something bigger than selling caffeine,” says Bryant Simon, a history professor at Temple University who wrote Everything but the Coffee, a 2009 book about Starbucks. Simon is the gadfly who won’t go away, contending that most of Schultz’s initiatives are brilliantly positioned mirages. Take Ethos, the Starbucks-owned house brand of bottled water. Customers may be excited that five cents of their purchase goes toward providing people access to clean water. In truth, when bottled water costs $1.8 a container, Starbucks keeps 97 percent of the purchase price.
Even the free-college initiative displeases Simon, who regards it as a public relations stunt, meant to convince Starbucks customers that baristas aren’t trapped in a dead-end job. “We’re supposed to believe that they’re all working toward a better future, with their employer covering the tab,” Simon remarks. “I wonder how many baristas will ever get a degree.”
Schultz wonders, too. The free-college initiative with ASU started about two years ago—and 5,000 employees have already enrolled. To date 44 have earned degrees. Another 100-plus expect to graduate this spring. It’s a struggle for baristas to get their old community-college credits transferred into the ASU system, to settle on a major and to meet all the deadlines for registration, term papers and the like. Since announcing the programme, both Starbucks and ASU have stepped up efforts to coach these online students through the full college process, rather than just handing them a student log-in code and hoping for the best. The graduation rate will likely keep climbing, but it could take another three or four years before the programme’s results are clear.
Most executives don’t have that much time. Periodically, Schultz gets calls from younger executives who want to know how they, too, can advocate for social causes without running the risk of getting fired. Marvin Ellison, the CEO of JC Penney, has sought him out. So has John Zimmer, the president of Lyft, the San Francisco ride-sharing company. Schultz’s blunt advice: “You have to earn the right.” Spend years winning investors’ trust by delivering strong results. Once you’ve done that, your degrees of freedom increase greatly. Get excited about non-business goals too early, and the trapdoor of termination can open at any time.
(This story appears in the 01 April, 2016 issue of Forbes India. To visit our Archives, click here.)