Biden's juggling act on Israel, always a challenge for a U.S. president, is especially difficult given that Democrats are no longer solidly in Israel's corner
President Joe Biden speaks with Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), left, and Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), right, upon his arrival in Detroit on Tuesday, May, 18, 2021. Biden was confronted on Tuesday by Tlaib over his support for Israel amid the violence in Gaza. Image: Doug Mills/The New York Times
WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden has maintained his public support toward Israel even as he adopted a somewhat sharper private tone with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a calculus shaped by Biden’s longtime relationship with the Israeli leader as well as by growing hopes that Israel’s military operations against Hamas are nearing an end.
In a phone call Monday, Biden warned Netanyahu that he could fend off criticism of the Gaza strikes for only so long, according to two people familiar with the call. That conversation was said to be significantly stronger than an official summary released by the White House. It affirmed Israel’s right to self-defense and did not repeat calls by many congressional Democrats for an immediate cease-fire.
That phone call and others since the fighting started last week reflect Biden and Netanyahu’s complicated 40-year relationship. It began when Netanyahu was the deputy chief of mission at the Israeli Embassy in Washington and Biden was a young senator with a passion for foreign affairs. Since then, they have rarely seen eye to eye but have forged an occasionally chummy working relationship through seven U.S. presidencies — Netanyahu has been prime minister for four of them — and raging political battles over the Iran nuclear deal and Israeli settlement policy.
Today, that relationship is as complicated as ever. Biden’s juggling act on Israel, always a challenge for a U.S. president, is especially difficult given that Democrats are no longer solidly in Israel’s corner.
Middle East experts and former U.S. officials say that many of Biden’s calculations are rooted in a different era of U.S.-Israeli relations — when Israel’s security concerns commanded far more attention than Palestinian grievances — and that his approach has less to do with the military situation on the ground than with domestic politics and his broader foreign policy agenda, including nuclear talks with Iran.
©2019 New York Times News Service