Job interviews are rarely calming affairs, but an overly stressful application process can taint a candidate's entire view on the company. There's a better way
Some recruiters believe that the high stress of a job interview presents an opportunity to evaluate the candidate's performance under pressure. A stressful interview, however, is at best a poor judge of future job performance, and at worst, harmful to the organization’s reputation, both as an employer and a brand.
According to recent research led by Julie McCarthy — a professor of organizational behaviour and HR management at the Rotman School of Management — candidates who exhibit higher levels of anxiety during job interviews are less likely to feel the evaluation process was fair, and less likely to recommend that employer to others.
“That has a broader implication for the organization,” she says. “[The candidate] will be less likely to use that organization’s products, they may be more likely to litigate, they are less likely to recommend that organization to others, and the list goes on.”
While the reputational impact might not be as extreme for smaller organizations, those that put tens or hundreds of thousands of applicants through their interview process could see a significant impact on their bottom line. For example, McCarthy points to a study in 2014 by Virgin Mobile, which found that the telecommunications giant suffered US$5.4 in annual losses from candidates who unsubscribed from their services following a negative application experience.
Also read: Hey, employers: Job hunters really want to see your diversity data
[This article has been reprinted, with permission, from Rotman Management, the magazine of the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management]