Centralised corporate structures are in no way better than DAOs as they lack decision-making from diverse inputs
Image: Michael Ciaglo / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP
Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs), according to Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, can be more effective and equitable than a conventional corporate structure.
Theoretically, DAOs have no central leadership and are collectively owned and controlled by their members. Voting on community-submitted suggestions is used to decide on all issues, including the use of treasury cash and protocol upgrades.
Buterin believes that while detractors of the idea contend that traditional corporate governance systems are significantly preferable and that DAO governance is inefficient, he contends that diverse input going into decision-making can make a lot of sense.
Convex judgments include choices in technology for cryptographic protocols, military strategy, and pandemic reaction. While legal issues, funding for public assets, and tax rates are examples of concave judgments.
He stated, "If a decision is convex, we would prefer a coin flip, and if it's concave, we would prefer a compromise."Â