Managers and employees alike are complaining that they spend too much time on this deep-rooted part of corporate life and that it has repercussions on their well-being
The meeting is an increasingly contested way of working, especially with the rise of remote work and videoconferencing. Managers and employees alike are complaining that they spend too much time on this deep-rooted part of corporate life, and that it has repercussions on their personal well-being.
All surveys point to the same conclusion: work meetings are on the increase, much to the dismay of their participants. Executives spend an average of 25 hours a week in meetings, whether by videoconference or around a table, according to a study carried out by Future Forum and reported by Bloomberg Law. And it's a practice they consider excessive and of little interest. In fact, the 10,000 white-collar workers surveyed estimate that more than half of these business meetings could be eliminated without affecting their productivity. Attendance at these Google Meet, Zoom or in-person meetings could represent a loss of earnings of almost €100 million for large private companies, according to Bloomberg.
But that's not the only drawback of this overload of meetings, sometimes dubbed "meetingitis." In fact, the proliferation of meetings greatly undermines everyone's autonomy and freedom of organization. Many employees accept the invitations they receive out of conformism, or for fear of being seen—especially by their superiors—as an unmotivated slacker.
This capitulation can become a real source of frustration at a time when many employees complain of not being able to carry out their tasks successfully. "Time is our most precious resource. So wasting it in meetings that don’t appear to serve any purpose is tiring and tedious. Awareness of opportunity costs—knowing that you could be doing something more positive or productive—adds to frustration that saps energy and motivation," productivity coach, Juliet Landau-Pope, told Stylist.